Wednesday, March 12, 2014

The latest advancement in child psychiatry, the HUGE tv

Huge TVs are the latest advancement in child psychiatry

Is buying your child the hugest TV available on the market the best treatment for your child's mental illness? It would be a good excuse to buy one, if you had the money and wall space.

Would seeing a person on TV the same size as he is in real life make a difference in his treatment? Yes, I believe it would.

What effect would this have with an adult? I believe it would be the same as a child.

What happens when he starts talking to the TV? Is he delusional? No. He could be talking with his psychiatrist, psychologist or therapist.

Is this healthy? Absolutely, especially when you are 150 miles away from your mental illness provider's office. Its just like being in the office. You forget that the other person on the other side of the desk or other side of the office is actually on a TV screen. I have personally experienced this to be true.

This is the solution for reaching undeserved and people in rural populations.

Its much different than using software like Skype, looking at your computer screen and talking close to it where the microphone can pick up your voice. Having someone in the same room as you, or perceived as such, makes the difference.

Audio Visual Conferencing on huge televisions is the future of taking care of rural clients. A room setup as such in the small rural towns is the solution. You can have a one on one appointment or a family appointment. This also resolves today's transportation problem.

Here is what U.S. Government's Energy and Commerce Subcommittee and Investigation had to say.

REACHING UNDESERVED AND RURAL POPULATIONS

The delay between a first episode of psychosis and the onset of treatment averages 110 weeks. Early diagnosis and medical intervention improves outcomes dramatically, but there is only one child psychiatrist for every 7,000 children with a mental illness or behavioral disorder.

Representative Tim Murphy, PhD [R-PA-18]says he has a fix for this. His bill, H.R.3717, Ensuring Psychiatric Care for Those in Need of Help the Most, will model a successful state project in Massachusetts advancing tele-psychiatry to link pediatricians and primary care physicians with psychiatrists and psychologists in areas where patients do not have access to mental health professionals.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

80% of all U.S. families did not read and did not buy a book last year.

80% of all U.S. families did not read and did not buy a book last year, a staggering statistics.

75% of readers prefer to read a book on paper rather than electronically.

The statistic for people who have not read a book since graduating from school is so depressing that I won't quote the number.

If you don't read a book or learn to read a legislative bill, you will listen to any opinion said by the media. You will believe the excerpt taken to be true and will add it to your belief system.

When I listen to a statement, asked to sign a petition based on the short section that was reported or asked to make a statement of such, I must go to the source and read the complete document before I can make my remarks.

Many times I've read a petition that has arrived via e-mail, read the horror and immediately sign the petition. My bad.

I appreciate how MoveOn.org sends me an e-mail, a petition that a member of the eight million members civic action group has written and asks for my opinion, if they should support it.

I start my research, looking for the original document or original statement that the petition was based on. I take my findings and report back to the organization my opinion of the petition. Some are spot on. Some are created after the fact, where a vote and decision have already taken place. This type of petition is the most frustrating of all. I raise the red flag and yell "stop the press!", vote has already been taken. There is nothing more embarrassing than receiving an e-mail or a text message asking me I know how to read, if I keep up with current events or am asked what I've been smoking. I feel like the person who Jesus called the worse possible name he called an individual person, a fool.

If I do not read, I will believe anything the media says, which means I am a fool. What I am hearing is what makes a good story, a reason to tune in a certain channel at a defined time. I'm told not to miss it. If I don't go read and research the remark, I will miss it.

Now is the time of opportunity. An opportunity for a volunteer fundraiser to sell you a book that will not only profit you, it makes a profit for the person who has volunteered his time because of his compassion for his cause.

If you are fund raising for mental illness, nothing is better than my book, Mott's Mind now in its second edition.


http://www.expressionsinquilting.com/mottsmindgenetics.html

Monday, March 10, 2014

Kansas CEOs stay one step ahead of the law

Two Kansas CEOs in Hutchinson, KS are staying one step ahead of federal law. They are not doing it to comply with upcoming laws. They are doing so because it makes common sense. It’s the right thing to do.

Treatment is less successful for patients who have health problems and also have a behavioral health problem. To treat a patient successfully you must look at him as
a whole individual, comprised of mind, body and soul. Too long has an individual been separated into two parts, treatment for health is in one setting while treatment for behavioral health illnesses is cared for in a completely different setting with a different staff and a completely different set of records.

In my book,Mott’s Mind, I tell my story of being admitted to a hospital for a brain tumor, being treated by a team of neurologist, and twenty-eight days later being discharged under the care of behavioral health care providers. The neurology team had never heard of anyone having their left side completely numb that actually needed treatment for depression. Little did I know I would be writing about it 30 years later. Perhaps it happened to me for the experience to share my story, I am an individual and my care must be treated as one entity rather than two. It took away 28 continuous days of my life, being in a hospital first in a normal hospital bed as a brain tumor patient to then be transferred a few stories up to be put in to a psychiatric bed.

I received an e-mail from Sally Tesluk, CEO of PrairieStar Health Center this past Friday. I believe her words describe the situation best.

On Friday, March 7, 2014 10:04 AM, Sally Tesluk wrote to Randy Conyers.:
“I have seen, through all of my years with PrairieStar (Health Center), that medical care is less successful if we do not include care for the mental health issues many of our patients experience. I believe a majority of our patients suffer from depression, anxiety, bipolar problems and many other serious issues.

PrairieStar (Health Center) and Horizons (Mental Health Center) have worked together for several years to try to overcome some of these issues. Mike Garrett, CEO of Horizons (Mental Health Center), has graciously sent a therapist to PrairieStar (Health Center) to help patients that present with physical problems, but also experience mental health issues.”


I was able to obtain a draft copy of the the fiscal year 2015 budget for the US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse Mental Health Services Administration whose focus is on the integration of Health Care and Mental Illness for a better delivery system for the wholeness of individuals and their families for mental and physical well-being.

Sally continued to write:
“We have not been able to expand our joint services due to lack of money to support a full scale integration. Now we have an opportunity to fund a fully integrated model of care at PrairieStar (Health Center), including help for patients with substance abuse issues.”

What a coincidence, grant money is available for such an implementation in the HHS budget report.

Plus there is more good news. United States Congressman Tim Murphy [R-PA-18] is sponsoring The Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis Act (H.R. 3717), which is being co-sponsored by 40 House Representatives, 34 from the Republican Party and 6 from the Democrat Party. I foresee many more House Representatives, from all affiliations, band together who will also want to co-sponsor this bill.

Representative Murphy’s bill, stated as a short summary of the bullet points are Integrates Primary and Behavioral Care, which PrairieStar and Horizons have been doing for two years, empowers Parents and Caregivers so physicians and mental health providers can share crucial information, check that bullet point, Driving Evidence-Based Care, again completed by PrairieStar and Horizons, and High Quality Community Behavioral Health Services

Still, the traditional grant application process has to take place. Cheese and Crackers! I discussed the situation with Rick Cagan, Executive Director of NAMI Kansas. He has volunteered his time to help us have a perfect application.

While I was a NAMI field organizer, I owe much gratitude to the community of Hutchinson while forming their NAMI support group.

My hope is for PrairieStar and Horizons to have their grant application accepted posthaste.

It is the opinion of this writer that PrairieStar and Horizons have been and are doing the right thing for the right reasons, using common sense and staying one step ahead of the federal law.


ADDENDUM
PrairieStar and Horizons are using Mott’s Mind. The Mott motto applies to both organizations, “Let us be known by our deeds as we shall be judged by our deeds.”

For additional information on integrating the two disciplines, Google Sir Fredrick Mott, prominent neurologist and pathologist whose views are documented in A History of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Sir Fredrick continued his work until his death in 1926, 88 years ago.

I know my relative would be pleased of the deeds of Sally Tesluk and Mike Garrett, 2 CEOs of Hutchinson, KS, USA and United States Representative Tim Murphy, PhD.

Sunday, March 9, 2014

Old "Murphy's Law" ends, Rep. Murphy's new law begins

"Murphy's Law" will cease to exist, effective March 15, 2014. Expression for Failure ends

There shall be "The Law of Murphy.", the law of fixes.

The time has come for the National Mental Illness Recovery System. It will be known as "The Law of Murphy.", the Murphy Fix.

Jean Williams has given her blessing to H.R. 3717

What does this mean to you and me? Mrs. Williams has approved The Helping Families In Mental Health Crisis Act (H.R. 3717), Ensuring Psychiatric Care for Those in Need of Help the Most. by Tim Murphy, PhD.

US Congressman Tim Murphy [R-PA-18], a psychologist by trade, is sponsoring this bill. The co-sponsors are a growing list, 34 are Republican and 6 are Democrats. As more understand the bill, the list of co-sponsors will continue to increase. Those who are spot on are:
Rep. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA-6]*
Rep. Lance, Leonard [R-NJ-7]*
Rep. Johnson, Eddie Bernice [D-TX-30]*
Rep. Fortenberry, Jeff [R-NE-1]
Rep. Stivers, Steve [R-OH-15]
Rep. Ellmers, Renee L. [R-NC-2]
Rep. Terry, Lee [R-NE-2]
Rep. Roe, David P. [R-TN-1]
Rep. Thompson, Glenn [R-PA-5]
Rep. Loebsack, David [D-IA-2]
Rep. Fitzpatrick, Michael G. [R-PA-8]
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Rep. Meehan, Patrick [R-PA-7]
Rep. Crawford, Eric A. "Rick" [R-AR-1]
Rep. Miller, Candice S. [R-MI-10]
Rep. Shuster, Bill [R-PA-9]
Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-3]
Rep. Coffman, Mike [R-CO-6]
Rep. Turner, Michael R. [R-OH-10]
Rep. Vargas, Juan [D-CA-51]
Rep. Roskam, Peter J. [R-IL-6]
Rep. Salmon, Matt [R-AZ-5]
Rep. Benishek, Dan [R-MI-1]
Rep. Gerlach, Jim [R-PA-6]
Rep. Olson, Pete [R-TX-22]
Rep. Capito, Shelley Moore [R-WV-2]
Rep. Calvert, Ken [R-CA-42]
Rep. Brooks, Susan W. [R-IN-5]
Rep. Hartzler, Vicky [R-MO-4]
Rep. King, Peter T. [R-NY-2]
Rep. Dent, Charles W. [R-PA-15]
Rep. Michaud, Michael H. [D-ME-2]
Rep. Griffin, Tim [R-AR-2]
Rep. Long, Billy [R-MO-7]
Rep. Jackson Lee, Sheila [D-TX-18]
Rep. Paulsen, Erik [R-MN-3]
Rep. Whitfield, Ed [R-KY-1]
Rep. Bera, Ami [D-CA-7]
Rep. Walorski, Jackie [R-IN-2]
Rep. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK-2]

Find your United States House of Representatives and ask him/her to co-sponsor HR 3713
http://www.house.gov/representatives/find/

If you have been following my posts, being afraid to Ask has been discussed. I will continue posting on this blog, high-lighting each section of this bill. I will also respond to comments, giving you my opinion. - Thank you

Friday, March 7, 2014

Pain and Suffering, Mental Distress or Punitive Damages. Pick one.

We like to sue people. Lawyers love to see people who want to sue and suggest they sue for more than they expected to be rewarded. Juries love to see large amounts awarded to people when the defendant is found guilty as this is money coming from insurance companies. The ultimatum to any threat is to defend with words, I will sue you. That's right, if you have been wronged you want payback. You are ready to sue. If someone threatens to hurt you, you counter with the threat to sue.

I can say, without doubt, If we are offended, in any way, we want retribution. We want the other side to be punished. We want vengeance. We want justice.

We want to be compensated for what we, or our lawyer, feel we lost, converted in to dollars and taken away from the livelihood of the guilty. We want their money and everything that money buys. We want them to feel pain, we want them to suffer, we want them to be distressed, we want them to be damaged, to be broken down. We want to take away their self-esteem. We want them to be shamed. We want to see them taken from their family and those who are family members, we want their lives to be ruined as well.

In doing such, the Plaintiff is happy. You are happy with the events.

As I ponder on what I wrote above, I believe the only thing we have not included in retribution, in our society, is the signing ceremony for the signature of the guilty on the Document of Ownership of your soul being turned over to the Devil.

The underlined words are also the results of a person living with a severe mental illness who has had a crisis. I know this to be true, not by learning about mental illness, I lived it. It happened to me yet I had committed no crime. I experienced it without being charged of offending or threatening anyone.

Therefore, I can conclude that it is correct to change the word 'sue' to 'make you live with a severe mental illness and have gone through a crisis'.

A sample letter could be written this way:

Dear Doctor Smith;

I am extremely unhappy with the colonoscopy that you performed on me on February 4, 2008 and your expert reading of such. I have had severe pain on my right side since November 21, 2013. I am now under the care of a Physician who is a specialist of the colon. He obtained my records from the hospital from such time and has found from these records that I had 3 areas of infection that should have not gone untreated. Today my colon has suffered enormous damage which will require difficult surgery.

You will be notified by my attorney that I am filing for you to live with a severe mental illness and to have a crisis on the grounds of malpractice. I have much pain and suffering, had my own mental distress and feel that you should also be punished for your lackadaisical care. This is my last correspondence with you. All future contact will be with the law office of UB Trouble, UN Trouble and IC Money, LLC.


I will become happy when the verdicts is read and receive the money I deserve. It won't hurt the Doctor, he's insured. Although I really don't care what the Doctor's Malpractice insurance premium is, I'm having second thoughts about him joining my peers living with a serious mental illness.






ADDENDUM
Before I published this post, I did some research.

One of the Malpractice Insurance Carriers received $500 million in premiums and have an outstanding balance of $1 billion dollars in unpaid claims. This is a Huge Red Flag.

Everyone in the chain of affordable health care must make a profit to stay in business. When there is such a huge loss at the beginning of the chain, that weak link connected to strong lengths in the chain bursts. The entire chain in health care becomes broken, swinging out of control. This means the costs are out of control as no one has been able to grab the wildly swinging chain. All of the rust on the weak link is caused by lawsuits. Money is going in to the legal system instead of health care, all because we, as citizens, are trigger happy to file suit. The efforts in tort law liability reform has come about too late. Regretfully, affordable health care premiums do not fix the rising costs of the infrastructure in health care.

Are we not the cause of the problem? How many people have $30,000.00 to pay for the upfront legal costs for a lawyer taking your case? How many more people would rather pay their lawyer a commission of the award if you win the case and pay your lawyer nothing if you don't win? Wouldn't your lawyer want to earn more money by raising the amount you are suing for so their commission would be more? Or, would you prefer to raise the commission rate you are paying your lawyer? I believe the answer is obvious. I believe I know who makes the decision on how to pay for legal costs.


Thursday, March 6, 2014

Cart reported as being ahead of the horse

How often have we heard about "putting the cart before the horse?"

How many times have we laughed, pointed fingers and gave the expressions of a fool? (well, I have).

What do you do when it was you who made the mistake? Learn from it, finger point, hope no one thinks it could be you since you are Ms. Perfect? How is it possible to be perfect when nothing can be exactly perfect.

Here is my point:

Seventy years ago we had 600,000 inpatient psychiatric beds in our country. Today, we only have 40,000. Five hundred and sixty thousand beds have been lost, plus the 47 we lost last month in OKC.

This didn't happen by accident. Oh wait, yes it did.

The focus to reduce hundreds of thousands of inpatient psych beds came about by using an alternative by switching those living with a serious mental illness in a hospital setting to living back in their communities. Psychotropic medications had drastic improvements, treatment, in general, had improved where, in theory, most people could receive out-patient services in their hometowns. It was a great idea.

Medicaid was so excited it created the Institutions For Mental Disease Exclusion. States loved it. Hospitals started shutting down. The responsibility would be that of local communities within a given county, within a given state.

Oh, wait. The local community mental health centers were not built. Model practices had yet to be established. The community services were not ready for the transition.

Did this stop the hospital closings? No.

Did Medicaid get a little 'trigger happy' with the exclusion of payment policies, meaning if you kept the majority of Medicaid patients you would not be paid for professional and institutional services? Yes.

Was anyone able to raise the red flag and stay STOP the transition? No.

Did the left hand know what the right hand was doing? No

Were patients being discharged with no where to go? Yes

Were patients getting their medications? No

Did patients, homeless and off medications, get in to trouble with the law? Yes

Did those patients go in to the correctional system? Yes

What was the plan when a new crisis occurred? What do you mean by crisis

The questions could go on and on.

Does anyone know what it means to put the cart in front of the horse? Most Certainly

Does anyone of authority know the mental illness system has the cart in front of the Horse? Oh, really?

Were people working within the system able to change their belief system to learn not to give a damn? Yes

Did people become so overwhelmed that they did not know what to do? Yes

Has the Federal Government thrown money at the system to patch it to make it work? Yes

Has State Government thrown money at the system to patch it to make it work? Yes

Is there anyone who can say stop, I can fix the problem, I can get the horse to the front of the cart?

ANYONE?

Does anyone believe in Murphy's law?

Stop the investigations

The final investigative study has been completed.

There is no reason to form a new task force for evaluation.

We know the census. It has remained constant for years.

No more appropriation of funds needed to look in to the problem. We can quit spending money looking for reasons.

The Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations launched a top-to-bottom review of the country's mental health system, beginning in January 2013. The investigation revealed the approach by the federal government to mental health is a chaotic patchwork of antiquated programs and ineffective policies across numerous agencies.

Not only is this frustrating for families in need of medical care, but when left untreated, those with mental illness often end up in our criminal justice system or on the streets. The mentally ill are no more violent than anyone else, and in fact are more likely to be the victims of violence than the perpetrators. But those individuals with untreated serious mental illness are at an increased risk of violent behavior. Tragically, undertreated mental illness has been linked to homicides, assaults, and suicides. Refusing police directions, as they could not discern what was happening, has resulted in shooting these people dead. I witnessed this in Baltimore, MD.

It is a national problem that needs legislation. At the state level, many have tried and failed. State funding goes hand in hand. At first, budgets had high dollar figures. But things became frustrating since the money didn't solve the problem. In turn, the failures resulted in cuts to state budgets. The questions, "where is the bang for the bucks" we spent and "what is our return on investment" while spending those funds? No big bangs heard. There was no return on investments where interest and dividends were never paid on the investment. The system was not self-sustaining. It was a financial investment loss. As such, the dead horse has been beaten and today state legislators continue to beat on the dead horse with different bats. Some left the budget the same but placed more responsibilty on their departments, trying to squeeze some form of ROI. Some states have chairmen of appropriations who take the human element out of the equation. I have been told, face to face, that appropriations put money in to the system and, as such, they have the right to also take money away. There was a tear in the Senator's eye and could only say, I'm sorry.

A personal story of mine comes from running for a state's House of Representatives. Once you have won your primary your mailbox becomes full of letters and questioners, your e-mail inbox reaches it maximum size plus your phone started ringing as well. Every entity that received state funding in the past wanted more money. It was expressed in the way of a need, not a want. I would respond with a request for reply to my questions, what have you done to resolve the problems within your agency and since the pie pan is the same size as last year, whose slice of the pie should be made smaller so your agency would have a larger slice of the pie? I expected replies. I had but one reply, the Association of Community Mental Health Centers. They were able to convince me of "Pay me now", a small amount if a person was in treatment, or "Pay me later", a large amount if the person went the route of local jail and in to the state correctional system.

I also learned about CIT, crisis intervention team, that had police going through a 40 hour class of crisis intervention training. What surprised me most, officers took their paid vacation time to take the class. They were volunteering their free time to study mental illness, knowing their personal investment would make their on-duty time easier. The time savings in transporting in-mates to state facilities was a huge cost saver. Having more time to work their beat increased greatly since they did not have to wait hours and hours waiting in an Emergency Room. It started by compassionate officers volunteering their free time, a remarkable act of random kindness.

An action of Helping Families in Mental Health Crisis would fix the nation's broken (or never completed) mental health system by focusing programs and resources on psychiatric care for patients and families who are the most in need of services.

States will contend that such a mindset is unconstitutional as it prevents the states from making their own laws, a Jefferson approach. However, the rebuttal is organizations, such as ALEC, advocate for the same law of like mind be passed in all states.

Who wants to take the responsibility for the consequences of the epidemic we have?

I'll wait for another day to discuss the ramifications of spending money with such a high deficit. I promise I will post about the Federal Reserve, a federal reserve note, a US Treasury Bill and what an economy is. It won't be tomorrow, but it will be before I intend to end this blog.


Wednesday, March 5, 2014

The third fix for the SAMHAS report.

In my previous blog,I stated, "People do not know where or how to get help."

I could have exchanged the word from get to ask. I am going to write about the ask. There is a certain fact, people don't like to ask for help.

The New York Times published an article written by ALINA TUGEND who discusses asking for help at work or at home. I am going to point out changing the word work to mental illness to show the impact it has.

"RAISE your hand if you have ever asked for help at work or at home. Raise your hand if you have ever felt shy or stupid in doing so. I think I can safely assume that most of us are waving our arms wildly. Requesting assistance from colleagues or friends, whether it be for a work assignment or to help care for our children when we are sick, is something many people have trouble doing. (Some, on the other hand, are all too comfortable leaning on others. We will get to them later.) In a society largely based on helping yourself — just go to any bookstore or library and browse the voluminous self-help section — it may seem odd to promote the idea that we need to learn better ways to ask for and receive assistance.

But a small movement is saying just that."
I would like to include myself in, what for now, is a small movement. My hope is to see a large movement, telling the people it is okay to ask for and receive assistance. Writing the statement for the answer to the question "Why am I here? will put this blog in to perspective. "You are here to help me as I am here to help you."

What does it feel like when I gave you the answer to the universe? What do think about receiving a one sentence response? All that I can do is testify its truth. I can't tell you the date, time or location of this event, because I don't know. I can not tell you who will help whom first, because I don't know. It might be difficult to discern the interaction.

A very likely scenario can be what happened to me, working at a Community Mental Health Center you would pick up the phone when staff had an out of office meeting and the receptionist had to leave a few minutes early to get her child to his first soccer game. The phone rang. I ignored it. The phone kept ringing, it wasn't time for the answering system to pick up. I picked up the call, not knowing what would be coming from the other end of the line. It was a first time caller. She wanted to know who we were, what we did, what should she do if a crisis were to happen (it seemed one was likely) and in general conversation I answered many "what if" questions.

I had never pick up the office phone before. I was very concerned about the first time I would be put in a position to do so. What I needed was training, someone in the office to be on the same line and could take over the conversation at the moment I made a mistake. Taking this call helped me greatly to know if I had to take another call like this I could do it. It was very empowering. She helped me address a problem I was very concerned about. At the end of the conversation she thanked me for helping to know what to do tonight and the options she has in her local community. She felt informed and knew what her plan would be. I knew she helped me work through the call, I had confidence I could do it again. She knew that I helped her in a time need.

If we were at the same location at the same time it would look like a chip and date chipmunk cartoon. She would say I helped her. I would say she helped me. No, she helped me. No, I helped her. The conversation would have gone as long as it took Chip to have Dale go before him while Dale was offering Chip to go first, after you, no after you, I insist you first, oh I couldn't, you first.... You will never know if your actions helped someone else, while that person had not a clue what help they were giving.

Imagine how overwhelming it was for the lady to pick up the phone to ask for help. On the first ring, the thought of embarrassment, 2nd ring - shame, 3rd - bad parent and the rings go on and on.

The fix is knowing It is okay to ask for help.


Where to get help is an awareness problem.

Knowing what to do during a crisis is an educational problem. Our society is getting better at eradicating stigma. Mental Illness is now a discussable subject in many ways. Still, people will exclaim, "Where's the help?". Its happened to me while posting on facebook. They seem angered, thinking it is someone else's responsibility to let them know. Those who read articles on budget cuts, hospital beds being reduced, availability of staff and other writings about no money, no service and long waiting lists have quite a paradigm. There are resource lists available in communities. There are links on websites. There are support groups that can be found by Internet search engines. There are lists in phone books. But that isn't good enough for people who know nothing about mental health.

Dial 2-1-1 Find help in your community

Learn the acronym SAMHSA and add .gov and go to its website.

S-A-M-H-S-A Substance-Abuse-Mental-Health-Services-Administration from the US Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary.


The fix is embedding 211 in to the minds of America, just like 911 has done.


The 3 fixes can be deemed as such because money has nothing to do with. Its a matter of human communication, one on one, telling the people you know to tell the people they know. Some will have a great conviction on the 3 fixes. Campaigns of awareness shall appear. Those with financial resources can reinforce the fixes. The media can report and share, without the need of conflict, an old approach that can be restored.


Treatment Partners

Welcome the non-seekers

It is okay to ask for help.

Remember to dial 211.








Monday, March 3, 2014

The second fix for the SAMHSA report

The statistics of the SAMHSA report makes one statement. Two-thirds of the mental illness population is not in treatment. People do not seek treatment, people do not know where or how to get help and people who do know where to go for help, do not receive services in a timely manner.

I can fix all three problems.

If you want to make a difference in this world, your opportunity is found here. If not, consider yourself dead to me on this subject. There is no need to continue to read.

Same is true if your stigma or belief system is so negative, you too are dead to me on this issue. Don't waste your time reading this post. I can not force you to be compassionate towards mental illness, I don't try to be. Its obvious when people pretend. I advise you to go do something else.

You must want to be part of the solution. No one is going to force you to learn.

I can address why people don't seek treatment in this post and fix it.

Blogs to follow will fix the problems of not knowing where to go for help and not being able to receive services, both before the next SAHMSA report.

A little knowledge about Mental Illness can go a long way in treatment. As long as you don't invoke a crisis, you are on the path of helping with recovery. Good intentions will go bad from time to time. That's natural. But bad intentions normally succeed in doing harm. In my book, Mott's mind, I frequently use the Mott motto, "Let us be known for our deeds as we shall be judged by our deeds."

A Treatment Partner can become effective with only 40hrs of training.

If you can invest an hour and a half of your time per week, for 13 consecutive weeks, you will be trained to start your new adventure of being a Treatment Partner. If you will add to this a few hours of volunteer time, I can get you educated without charging you a cent, its free.

With a person wanting to gain knowledge about mental illness, I had a person who traveled 180 miles roundtrip every week because he loves his wife. He wants to help her by understanding her disease and is willing to do anything he can to help her. He wants his wife beside him for the rest of his life. He has the qualifications for the perfect Treatment Partner. I can help you with finding the locations of these free classes, regardless of where you reside.

There are two distinct theories for approaching the problem, medications and talk therapy.

Some people respond to medication while others respond to talk therapy using cognitive thinking. Both methods create changes to your neuro-net of the brain.

While the outcome of the change is unknown, either method will change how the mind attempts to correct its cells. Some cells will reroute themselves as other cells will attempt to be self-repairing. Each change is activated by sending a request to another area of the brain. Cells relay the message. For now, I'm going to say its like a spark plug wire, communicating when to power and giving it the needed power to do so. I will be described in detail the spark plug in an upcoming post.

Remember, there are two distinct methods to fix the communication from cell to cell. A successful transmission is called a synapse.

There are different physical locations a person should reside at to allow cells attempt to make their fix. The environment effects the outcome. An in-patient facility works. An out-patient setting works for being an assisted out-patient treatment center. Being in the mountains of Montana, being out on the range is also a good setting. In each case, you will never be alone.

The person needs to be observed as they go through their daily routine. We are creatures of habit. We repeat our actions. The entity most likely to be aware of these actions is the Treatment Partner.

Certain malfunctions manifest in to a classification of diseases. There are diseases that can not be recognized by the person with the illness. They have to be told how their emotions and actions are behaving. As an example, a person who is manic can not recognize they are in a state of mania. It feels "normal" to them. A Treatment Partner must tell the person the change they observe in behavior or looks. If there isn't a Treatment Partner, the mania will continue until it becomes a crisis.

Psychotropic medications are not like "traditional" pills, like forms of pain killers. Its difficult to suggest psych medications when the results they produce are documented as unknown, but they work. I have heard too many people say, they or their child took the medication for the entire weekend and it didn't help at all. It was like thinking a person had a headache and took two full days of medication and nothing helped. Pain relief pills would have helped, but this stuff didn't. They throw the medication away, not understanding how some psych medications work. People who have situational depression are prescribed a medication that can take weeks before their body starts to detect a change. They too throw the prescription bottle away and conclude it doesn't work. They tell their friends of their experience, who tells another friend. The word of mouth communication is the best way to get a message out, especially when its bad or negative. Reasons as such keep people from seeking treatment. If a Treatment Partner is in the pipeline of these discussions, they can shut the pipeline down, go to pumping stations and intervene. Words will be spoken. Those who believe the statements to be true will accept mental health recover. Those who reject the statements will continue to remain untreated. People will either accept or deny thoughts put before them. You turn the pumping stations back on, allow the communication pipeline to continue to flow and wait. You wait until you see the next report from SAMHSA. How many crisis situations existed? Did the number of suicides go down or up? Will SAMHSA add a new column to count Treatment Partners?

Psych medications are not evil. Some perceive them to be so by looking at what they ca n physically see with their naked untrained eyes. Who can see internal actions being taken in a biochemical way? Especially when power can not be monitored and actions being taken for which no detection device has been created for? The invention has yet to be discovered. Yet, something is happening. It is scarey but not evil.

Some can not imagine having to take a pill for the remainder of their lives, day after day after day. They refuse to commit to do so. Others see the physical side effects. Some refuse the idea that weight gain is possible. They would rather keep their outward looks appealing than focus on the degradation going on in their brain. Kate said it best, "I would rather be fat than crazy."

The perceptions of psychotropic medications keep people away from seeking treatment.

However, a Treatment Partner knows there is a different direction that can be taken for treatment, talk therapy.

PTSD is a problem, especially for the military. When I took my class in psychotropic medications from the Kansas University School of Social Services, it was documented that outcomes for treatment were the same, regardless of treatment method.

Talk therapy works. Talk therapy can work for people, who never have to take medication. But what keeps people from talking?

A poll was taken in 1978 to find the greatest thing that caused fear. At the top of the list was speaking to a group of people. Topic did not matter. The act of leaving where you were seated, walking before a group of people make people become nervous. The thought to open your mouth and start speaking is a fear. In anticipation, your inner radar is looking for a response, be it audible or a type of body language. If no one is listening, the speaker turns inward and starts searching for reasons. Watch a stand-up comic that receives no reaction after telling his best jokes. They don't know what to do. This can become overwhelming. People would rather not take the risk.

Stuffing more and more emotions can burst, creating a crisis. Stuffing thought gets to the point of hearing your thoughts, over and over again. The mind becomes tired of listening to itself, it wants this repetition to stop, which makes it become a negative thought in an endless loop which consumes you. A crisis occurs, primarily suicide, to make the noise stop.

It takes much energy to be consumed in thought. This is the reason people with major depression are so tired, it robs so much energy from you.

The energy consumption can become so great, involuntary actions can malfunction. I have sat beside a person, multiple times, who begins to think and feel what the others within the group think and feel about him. His equilibrium malfunctions and he falls out of his chair. He didn't faint. He lost control of what keeps all of us upright and walking straight on a spinning planet that rotates around the son. An unbelievable event! A Treatment Partner will have incidental contact of all kinds, learning more about emotions and thought processes, seeing the consequences first hand.

Imagine a person having such fear, thinking of sitting in a waiting room, getting up, walking up in front of others to proceed walking in to an office and talking to the group, the group comprised of one person. These people will refuse treatment by thinking through the scenario.

The final reason for not seeking treatment in this post will be about the "smart" people who know the consequences of seeking help, being taken away from their children or their children being taken away from them. They know a therapy session is not a confidential matter. Your therapist most likely is a first reporter, listening for anything that would be judged as child abuse. They also try to perceive if you are a danger to themselves or others. The client may start their session, thinking it is confidential conversation. But as soon as you utter keywords, shows scars or bruising, your private session is over. Your words or looks are recorded in your chart and the authorities are called. A "smart" person will not seek treatment as there would be worse self-induced consequences if something is revealed by mistake. They know that being 100% honest is not the wisest thing to do. They decide it is better to not seek treatment, until a crisis exists.

The above paragraph has initiated state legislators to write protection laws to keep certain situations from being recorded in the clients charts. The rule of charting states if a situation is not recorded, it never happened. In my state, paraphrasing, a depressed person or one with suicidal thoughts are to be asked if they have access to a gun. Of course they have access to a gun. In this state, everybody can gain access.

It makes me wonder how many things are done,in the best interest of all people, that has an adverse effect to the extent that people can justify, without a doubt, they want nothing to do with seeking or asking for help.

Will SAMHSA add a new column to count, or estimate, those who do not seek treatment for a specific reason, that being they don't want help?

Imagine what influence Treatment Partners could have in everyday life.

Saturday, March 1, 2014

The First Fix for the SAMHSA Report

The definition of treatment for mental illness shall read as follows, The initial treatment mission is the formation of a treatment team, which shall include family members[1] or caregivers[2] for one or more individuals of such collective who have been diagnosed with having a mental illness, or may have a diagnosable mental illness in their lifetime, regardless of age.

The Impact of the illness will, at first, be overwhelming. It will take a keen awareness for family members or caregivers to accept they must play a roll in treating the illness. Identity can change but is easy to fix. You may introduce your family as the "biPolar family" rather than by your surname. The correct greeting is Hello, we are the Murphy family. Our family has a biPolar diagnosis.

There is a remedy for those having an identity problem. You are part of a team, a treatment team. While HIPAA laws ensure a patient's privacy, there are others who need to know your PHI, protected health information. These entities are called trading partners or business partners. The family treatment team is a partner to the one(s) who have been diagnosed. Your position is not a role of relationship, such as father, mother or brother. You are known as a partner. Being known as a partner lessens the stigma towards mental illness. A partner is comforting. There will be no loss of sleep in perceiving yourself as a partner. It is also empowering. You are empowered parents and caregivers, being protected by privacy rights, just as professional mental health providers. You have an important responsibility for being on the treatment team. Crucial information interchanged about a love one who is in an acute mental health crisis to protect their health, safety and well-being is a must for recovery.

I can personally testify that treatment teams work. Holding the position of peer worker in a community mental health center, I would be included in what we called family meetings. Family meetings consisted of the client, family members who were trying to help their loved one, professional mental health providers, case managers and a peer who has been assigned to the client. The client appeared to be stable when discharged from a state mental hospital. However, after a couple of weeks living in the community she became drastically worse. The entire team pondered on the cause. Being the peer worker on the case, the client told me repeated times she takes her pill, but actually takes two, but it was, infact, 1 pill. As the family meeting continued, her brother had noticed the name brand pill was being used in the hospital but when she was discharged she was given a generic prescription. As the days went by more of the generic medication was entering her system, which paralleled her change in mood. My question to the brother was the client's statement of taking 1 pill, but actually takes two, but it was, infact, 1 pill which, made no sense to me. He was able to describe the situation in detail. The generic pill was huge, to the family it was a horse pill and for the client, she could not swallow the pill. The brother would cut the tablet in to two pieces. She would take the 1st piece of the pill, followed by taking the 2nd piece. At times, the 2nd piece was not taken until hours later, but always before a set time of the day. It seemed reasonable to part of the professional treatment team but it raised a red flag for me. Knowing her diagnosis, I asked for the name of the generic. I asked which pharmacy they used. I was quite familiar with the medication and the pharmacy since I took the same medication and used the same pharmacy. I knew it was dispensed in the size of a horse pill, just like the brother described. It was easy to understand the actions of the brother and the problem with swallowing it whole. I asked if he read the "book" that was stapled to the bag that contained the pill bottle. The answer was no. That's it, I exclaimed. The entire team stared at me. There was a caution in bold letters within the stapled information sheets explaining the consequences of cutting the tablet as it had diverse effects on the delivery system of the medication. In layman's terms, it could really screw a person up, as it put this person in to crisis. The intervention happened during the crisis. Corrective measures were taken. Crisis resolved.

In the above meeting, the family member's input was the solution to the problem. Family Partners are a must. Family Partners are a critical resource. Family Partners solve problems that the professional mental health providers did not have training in. My story was about a situation that took place in the one-third of the people who are receiving treatment. But what about the two-thirds of the people who are not seeking treatment or have found where to be treated, but could not receive services? Can Family Partners decrease the numbers we see on the SAMHSA report? Most Certainly.

My next post will be the fix, the solution for the 2/3rds that go untreated.

Friday, February 28, 2014

SAMHSA reports are just meaningless numbers, they don't fix anything.

I live in the state that has the 2nd highest number of people living with a mental illness. The number of 0's in total individuals is a staggering number. But recovery from mental illness is not an individual's problem, it is a family problem. Those who are parents and caregivers have the problem too. You don't attempt to help the individual, you must help the entire family, regardless of the age of the person living with or suffering from mental illness.

Before we look at and talk about numbers, you must understand that mental illness is not an individual disease. It is a family disease. Family members suffer, sometimes even more. You can't treat the individual without treating the family.

A person may have a treatment plan but what he needs is a Treatment Team. The family is equally important to a therapist, case manager, peer specialist and Psychiatrist or Psychologist.

Experts will tell you the mental health system is broken. The theory of treating individuals is wrong to begin with. The fact is family members must be involved and treated as well.

When the basic premise is wrong, regardless of what comprises a mental health system, you can consider it broken. Rather, it is incomplete. What appears to be focused on is not even the target.

Our society comes from the tradition of our elders and the elders before them. Changes are made in the present for today and the future. As we learn more about ourselves, our society attempts to change. Some want to stay with a traditional mindset while others can see a higher level of existance is possible. They yearn for it.

Very little has changed with our traditions for the mentally ill. We send the person away. We hope his mind becomes right. Some day, he may come home. Our family will put an individual in a Will stating, "If my son becomes of right mind,". Kind words are found on tombstones. But what has the family been able to do? Sit outside in the waiting room? Existing HIPAA laws keeps the patient's privacy away from parents and caregivers.

Changes are going to keep the family members together, making them part of the treatment team.

I am going to share the "fix" with you in my next post.

Busy day for reviewing the latest report from SAMHSA, from the US Department of HHS, Kathleen Sebelius Secretary

A busy Friday is scheduled for today, all related to mental health.

I will be meeting with a reporter from the Oklahoman, the largest newspaper in the state and one of the highest circulated newspapers in the United States.

We will be discussing the latest SAMHSA report released, primarily why the state of Oklahoma has the 2nd largest population of people with a mental illness.

Then on to a meeting with the COA, Coalition of Advocates, a mental health advocacy group in the state of Oklahoma. I’ve been asked to take the chair for NAMI Oklahoma – Edmond North-OKC.

(I’ll have to tell all parties that I have written a book on mental illness too.)


Thursday, February 27, 2014

She turned from an advocate to activist. Hear the consequences.

My Mott's Mind recalled a very nice lady who turned her advocacy efforts in to becoming an activist. Activists must believe in 3 things, Respect for Self, Respect for others and taking responsibility for the consequences of any action.

She came to mind when I learned about "coffee chat" at the Oklahoma State Capital scheduled for this coming Thursday morning between 7:00AM - 9:30AM, which I was happy to be a volunteered for, representing NAMI Oklahoma - Edmond North-OKC.

I can recall my first time going with this lady to another state capital. As soon as we stepped in to the Dome, off she went to get a published schedule for today's agenda. I told her to wait up as I was going to go with her. She obvious knew her way around the limestone building, which included a tunnel in the basement and special elevators to use. We rushed up to a Representative's office, who I had never of heard before. Out comes this huge cinnamon roll, apparently the Rep's favorite homemade kind. The assistant said the house was in session but after she thought about it for a second, she phoned the Rep. He told his assistant to let her come in to the floor, as he had been waiting on her for this happy breakfast delight. In she goes. I stayed behind. She thought it was a cool thing to be allowed to do. Little did I know she was a registered independent lobbyist, working on mental health issues for children. She had the same illness as mine, her quality time was around my time frame, had to take medication that knocked her out, just like mine as well. She knew exactly where each rest stop was on I-70 and was self-aware when it was time to get off the highway. I learned to do the same.

On a windy day, she crossed the middle line of the highway near a city that had a huge stigma problem and a large number of officers along the interstate. She was pulled over and was arrested for being under the influence of prescription drugs. She was handcuffed, finger printed and thrown in to a jail cell. To make the issue worse, she was on her way to visit her son who was an inpatient in a mental health hospital. Instead she spent the night in jail.

I went with her to the hearing, getting to meet her lawyer ahead of time. We went outside to have a smoke and discuss the case. I asked her if she could make the charges go away. She said she probably could but she and the defendant wanted to plea not guilty and have a jury trial. An activist event was taking shape, just like the 2 wanted. I left shaking my head, wondering why the two wanted to risk a trial. An activist does what an activist does. They wanted the case to go before a jury, and they got what they wanted. The lobbyist/advocate/activist left with a big smile on her face. My Mott's mind could not imagine what could possibly be the intent. I knew what her consequences would be, but she wanted to take the risk like she and her lawyer had planned.

Weeks went by and no trial date had been set. Months went by, violating her rights to a swift and just trial. Still, that was not their goal. I shook my head. Time continued to pass by, week after week, until the case was dismissed. Now they were happy. The court could not find a jury for the case. Stigma was so bad in that area of the state, no one was willing to sit on the jury.

The Activist won!

The news was spread around the region. Simply, no one wanted to talk in the open about mental illness. It seemed best to keep the subject hidden behind closed doors and placed in the very back of people's closets.

The Mott motto once again prevailed, "Let us be know by our deeds as we will be judged for those deeds."

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Conyers volunteers his time to NAMI - Edmond North-OKC

With an unforeseen change in Project Managers, Randy Conyers' book, Mott's Mind will be placed on temporary hold until a new project manager has been assigned.

In the meantime, Conyers is donating his time to NAMI Oklahoma - Edmond North-OKC affiliate.

Conyers worked on completing the website www.namiedmond.org and Facebook page for
NAMI Oklahoma - Edmond

Not only has Conyers volunteered his time, he has also given the affiliate a gift in-kind for promoting the Facebook page and Website. Advertising efforts have been working well.

Conyers' hobbies include legislative issues, turning bills in to law. He has started on a mental health advocacy team that he hopes will turn in to a Mental Health Coalition.

Randy will return to promoting his book, Mott's Mind 2nd Edition, towards the end of February.

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

In 1959, exposure to MI meant being treated to a chocolate jet

Chocolate jets from the local Dairy Queen store were a special treat for me. I would do about anything for this delicious treat.

For those who do not remember the late 50's and early 60's I doubt if you know what a DQ Chocolate jet is. A paper cylinder with a wooden stick going the through the free standing bottom was filled with deep rich chocolate ice cream with the signature twirl top, frozen to the exact temperature made a perfect jet. You would push the ice cream up with the stick to get every drop. No soft-serve would ever fill a jet.

Each time my grandmother and I returned to town a chocolate jet was in order. Each roundtrip back to town meant a chocolate treat for me. Once a week, we would head out west of town. We had to count the number of dirt roads we passed so we could turn south off of the highway.

There were no signs to direct us to our destination on the dusty dirt road. But I knew the name of where we were going, Cedar Rest. Out in the wheat fields of Kansas stood this two story limestone building. There wasn't a parking lot. Grandma would park on the grass quite far from the building. She could have drove right next to the building but she would rather hike to the entrance. Besides, she said I would be safer out here, in the middle of nowhere. It had to take grandma at least 10 minutes to reach the front of the building. When she returned to the car it seemed like she walked for an hour.

I followed my instructions to the letter, knowing my obedience meant a chocolate jet. The doors had to stay locked and the windows rolled up. I was allowed to open the vent window just a little. I could not allow anyone in the car. When most children were told to be seen but not heard, it was best if I couldn't be seen at all. I could lay on the seat, impossible to be seen from the range to the building. I found I could hide from Grandma as well. Getting down on the floor board, I could get under the dashboard. With everything made of steel, plus an air vent, it was a nice cool place to hide. All that was on my mind was that dairy delight. Everything else didn't matter.

It took some time before my mind started to wonder what Grandma was doing and what, exactly, was in the limestone prison. All I knew was children of my age were not allowed access. I wouldn't have known what an asylum was anyway. I don’t believe they were called mental health hospitals during that time of high stigma.

I was never scared. It was simply something we would do so I could get my chocolate jet.

I liked watching TV with Grandma and Grandpa in the evenings, even more at times when they were doing something else. There were certain shows that had things on them from time to time that I wasn’t suppose to watch. If they were in the room, the channel would be changed. There was a time a building that looked like Cedar Rest. Now, I would be able to see in. I saw lines of beds. Workers wore all white clothing, like a nurse would. There was a commons where people looked like they were playing games or watching TV. The problem was they all looked so sleepy. I believe some were asleep without being in their beds. Something was wrong with them. That’s what I thought Cedar Rest probably looked like inside. It seemed to be a boring place most of the time. Once in awhile somebody would really get mad and they would get a shot or taken away by big men all dressed in white.

It seemed liked in the past, I had been inside such a place but knew for sure I never walked a step in to Cedar Rest. The TV show wasn’t scary to me. I had yet to be taught to be afraid, to have a stigma towards these people. I saw they had some kind of illness and needed help. I never judged these people or thought differently about them. They just needed help, just like everybody else. The only thing that I knew for certain was if you went to visit them, always stop and get a chocolate jet on your way home.

I believe it’s easy for me to work with the mentally ill. Little did I know, at that time, I would have a similar illness some day. No one ever talked to me about the possibility.


Monday, February 24, 2014

Announcement of New Publisher

Randy Conyers is proud to announce Tate Publishing as the new publisher of his book, Mott’s Mind.

“We receive tens of thousands of submissions”, said acquisition editor Shelley Coil, “but we choose to accept only a small percentage of the authors who submit manuscripts to us. Randy’s work is what we were looking for.”

Conyers has over 30 years of designing computer software before his accident and crisis, which made him disabled.

After 9 years in recovery, Randy started writing.

He was named the “Prolific Writer” of KS for LTEs by Joan Wagon, past Topeka mayor, Kansas House Representative and Executive Chairman of her political party.

“When I was a computer consultant for Magellan Behavioral Health in Columbia Maryland, I was encouraged to write a book about my life experiences of being a 10th generation member of the Mott family living with a mental illness.”, Conyers remarked, “So I did. The time was right.”

Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC, is a Christian-based, family-owned, mainline publishing organization based in the Oklahoma City metro area. Their specialty is promoting new authors, like Randy Conyers. His book, Mott’s Mind, is scheduled to start production in February 2014. Release date and price have not been determined by at this time.

“I am impressed with the team assembled by Tate for making Mott’s Mind a success. I would like to express much gratitude to each person working behind the scenes. You can accomplish anything if you don’t mind who gets the credit.”, Conyers said. The team is comprised of Shelley Coil, Acquisition Editor; Curtis Winkle, Executive Editor; Melanie Hughes, Executive Director of Production; Rachael Sweeden, Director of Operations and Project Manager; Cheryl Moore, Photos and Graphics; and Mark Mingle, Executive Director of Marketing.

Randy Conyers is also a public speaker. To schedule him for your next event, contact Randy at RandallConyers@yahoo.com Randy lives in Edmond, OK.


Why the 2nd Edition was written, to try to help one individual

The second edition was written at the request of a trustee of a library and foundation in the New England Region of the United States and from Zurich, Switzerland. The book has grown from 179 pages to 203 pages and has more thoughts, vision and an addendum B. Titled "Peer Thoughts" which is included for a larger audience. Publishing has begun at Tate Publishing, Inc. in Mustang, OK

Distribution does not start until from Tate until summer of 2014.


Randy Conyers’ autobiography is focused on his mental Illness. Randy was born in Wichita, KS at the Wesley Hospital in 1955. He is the second son of Robert Alonzo Mott and Vivian I. Mott. His birth certificate’s name is Randall Craig Mott. His character has always been one of the Mott family. The book follows the Mott Crest and mottos.

This book is for professionals and career bound individuals who now suffer from a mental illness and also their family members. It is suggested reading for advocates, activists and those working in the field of mental health. The book follows the life of Randy Conyers who shares his story of living with a mental illness. His family crest and mottos, “Let us be known for our deeds” and “We shall be judged by our deeds” are themes carried throughout the book. It demonstrates that a recovery path is possible, the discovery of self-awareness and regaining self-esteem.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

You ARE Alone - Presentation 5 of 5

I am Randy Conyers, writer of Mott’s Mind.

I am going to speak on being alone, which can be found in my book.

My thought, the thought, for any mental illness is the concern of being alone.

If this is the first time you have felt an impact of your illness, or going through the never ending cycles of your mental illness, there is a point of loneliness. I know this is true because it has happened to me, and my peers.

I talk about this in my book, Mott’s Mind.

You, the person who has been told they have a mental illness, is thrown in to a room, the door locked, and the key thrown away for all eternity. You were left behind, there are no others, only you. You find yourself alone forever.

An analogy to solitary confinement would only be a beginning of an analogy used as a comparison.

You are alone with only your thought. You have been thrown away, an unwanted outcast. You are self-aware of being nothing, yet voices run through your mind.

Multiple conversations are mingled together that talk for days, unending. The mind will haves times of complete silence too. The longer the silence continues and no interaction with the mind, becomes as severe as an eternity of conversations talking that you listen to.

In my mind, the only resolution to stop the voices is termination. To stop the silence, you do not want to exist. You yearn for an identity.

You have the fear of going before the master, be it a higher level entity or the one you idolize the most, where you hear the words, “I tell you, I do not know where you come. Depart from me.”

These are not thoughts of suicide, an act of ending your life due to circumstances that you feel are too pressuring to overcome. I am focusing on a matter of no identity or characteristics to demonstrate you have a life of your own.

Another mindset for being alone is that of being in a womb. While you are going through the evolutions to create human life, but not complete. You become suspended, the same way a non-completed painting is put on the shelf for tens of years, or an unfinished doll puppet hanging on your workshop wall since grandpa died. You are trapped, incapable of doing anything for yourself.

Along comes a painter who sees you sitting on the shelf, wipes you clean and finishes the work of art. A grand painting you have become. Your son, born with the gift of craftsmanship, like your grandfather, takes the doll from the workshop wall, blows off the dust and completes the work your grandfather started. You are now a prized possession, kept with your family’s finest china.

When you are finished, you are born to also be a prized possession. You are complete with all toes and fingers. Yet sometimes, you are not considered anything special, you are a liability.

That can also be true with the grand painting, it is not liked in today’s society and is thrown in the trash, headed towards the dump. The prized doll is auctioned off with everything in the china closet deemed to be made inferior in respect to the finest china made only for royalty. And you, where your family says, “It would have been better for him if he had never been born”. These are all negative feelings, robbing you from self-esteem and self-respect. It’s a devastating feeling of loneliness.

Can your belief system accept one of these descriptions? Is there an understanding that makes sense to you? If so, say to that scenario, “Get over it”, “just snap out of it”, “you’re lazy, go to work”. Do you believe any of such statements have meaning to what I described? Can you communicate with someone who has no idea of who they are? Can you expect an immediate response? Can you vision an immediate recovery?

I have sat beside an individual where the realization of his illness has become so strong his equilibrium, his balance of emotions, failed him. He literally falls over from sitting in a chair. It appears he has fainted, resulting in hitting the floor. He has not. He has no symptoms of suddenly becoming unconscious. It is the realization that he has such an illness and the impact is so emotionally strong he has lost control over an involuntary action. He knows he hasn’t fainted and is offended by attempting to be treated as such. He asks to be taken home, regardless of the distance, the event being attended and the importance it was to the person or family volunteering to take him home? He can only think about himself and how others are judging him. He would rather be alone, physically and with his thoughts.

When I was a peer worker, I had 3 new clients to meet. When I looked at their addresses they were very close to each other. It was an apartment complex where all 3 were in the same building, all facing the south.

I knocked on the first door and met a gentleman. He said he was alone, no one would be able to understand his situation. We had a good visit. It was just two doors down to see the next client. She too said she was alone, a lonely person that no one could understand. I told her that was interesting as I met a man living two doors down who was also alone. We, too, had a good visit. I went two more doors down to meet my third client. She told me she was alone. I told her she was the hatrick, the third person in 5 apartments who was all alone. It was a phenomenal coincidence. She smoked and so did I. We decided to sit out at the picnic table and talk. My lighter was in my car but when I passed my 2nd client, I remember she smoked too. I knocked on her door and asked if I could get a lite. She gave me a lite and asked what I was doing. I told her I found a person who was all alone, no one would understand her, you probably would though. She decided she would come out and have a smoke too. Now I had 2 people, who were previously completely alone with their thoughts, with me.

I saw the curtain open, ever so little, to the 1st apartment. Somebody was watching us, obviously the person, the 1st person I met that day, alone with thoughts. I asked him to join us, and to my surprise he did! They talked and talked. I don’t think they ever realized I left.

As a peer worker, your job description includes lowering your census count, which means I am trying to work myself out of a job. A few weeks after my visits I learned that Sunday evening was their Taco Night. Was I ever invited? No. It was a great feeling of accomplishment, people reaching their first step in recovery.

We,in NAMI, like to use the motto of “You are not alone.” But it takes a commitment of investing in these individuals. “When you are in recovery, you are not alone”.

These are thoughts I share in my book.

Thank you.

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Everyone should do it at least once in their lifetime Presentation 4 of 5

“Everyone should do it at least once in their lifetime.” These are the words of the Individual who was teaching my candidate training class, who is now running for Governor in my home state.

Hello, my name is Randy Conyers. I wrote the book. Mott’s Mind, my story of living with a mental illness. In fact, I am the 10th generation in my bloodline living with a mental illness. Living such a lifestyle, even while on disability, you can make a better quality of life for yourself and your family. The key is realizing Recovery is possible. It doesn’t mean you be healed or won’t have drastic setbacks. You keep looking toward the future, becoming an advocate and, when the time is right, an activist.

One of the hottest topics in mental illness today is the loss of hospital beds. I belong to a discussion focus group on the LinkedIn website. The title is “Where are the psychiatric beds in America, becoming a real issue in the communities.

It became a large issue where I live, in Oklahoma City, at the end of 2013 where 57 beds are closing in February 2014, stating there was not a need for the facility in their community, their area of OKC. 70 people are losing their jobs. It is a devastating loss. I have asked to be on the agenda for the next hospital Board of Directors meeting that owns the facility. So far, I have not been notified. But why should I? I’m not a famous writer, not yet anyway.

What influence do I have over a private company? What characteristics do I have that should be listened to? I have my story. I am an advocate and, at times, an activist. In Oklahoma, I’m a nobody. But there is always something I do. I ask. I call it making “The Ask”. You’ll never know what might happen by simply making an Ask. As long as you respect yourself, respect others and take responsibly for your actions, anyone will listen to you.

You can do anything, regardless of where you are at in your recovery process, just make sure you don’t care who gets the credit.

If your compassion is to see the restoration of mental health beds in hospitals, make it so. The largest impact comes from your state legislature. You will need to establish a relationship with your Representative and Senator. You will need to tell your story and establish an on-going dialog. You will be an advocate for mental illness with a focus on opening MI hospital beds.

Your correspondence will be replied to. You can ask to be put on the agenda for testifying before legislative committees, talk with the media, write letters to the editor and attend town hall meetings.

Changes for mental illness means new laws, laws amended and laws repealed.

You will find my comments in my book.

Besides having a strong genetics of mental illness in my life, I also inherited a compassion for politics, influencing people and having the character that relates to people, giving them a reason to believe in me and gaining a feeling of trust.

When you advocate for mental illness, you become part of the legislative process which, in turn, gets in to politics.

Your involvement can result in you running for a public state office. That’s what I did. “Everyone should do it at least once in their lifetime.”

I talk briefly about politics in my book. I share my high points and the lows, the stigma that goes with you as one living with a mental illness and a greater stigma being called a politician. If you carry a stigma monitor with you, pull it out after you have shared with someone that you live with a mental illness. See where the needle points. Tell the same person you are running for your state’s legislature. You would appreciate his vote and making a donation to your campaign. Look at your stigma monitor needle and see how higher it goes. It will probably go up significantly.

In my book I talk about reaching the recovery stage of taking action, some will like you while others will despise you. It’s amazing what a lady of 90 years can call you in one breath. Again, stories like this are in my book.

People’s belief systems follow the traditions of there family. Many have the same beliefs about mental illness recovery as they do on changing an area in society.

You must have a message. Recovery is important for every 1 in 4 people, based upon statistics from NAMI. Recovery is a must from PTSD in our military and those who were abused, rehabilitation in our jails and prisons to starting on an individual’s Recovery for those who should be at home taking their medications.

These issues are addressed as Jobs, Education and Health Care. 90% of questions and remarks you make will be made on the big three, Jobs, Education and Health Care. All are related to mental illness.

The key to talking on these subjects is to have a personal story on each issue and how important it is to solve these problems in the future.

“Everyone should do it at least once in their lifetime.”

Just imagine the number of prepared speeches that are on the top of your head right now.

Start your journal today. Give it a title of “Recall and Recovery”.



Those are some things that may be of interest to you as, “Everyone should do it at least once in their lifetime.”

Thank you

Friday, February 21, 2014

ASK Presentation 3 of 5

My name is Randy Conyers. I have shared my story of living with a mental illness in my book, Mott’s Mind.

After my last mental illness crisis in 2004, I hit rock bottom. I was fired from the company I had been employed by since 1981 as the Computer Software Director of Research and Development for a subchapter S corporation, while I was in the intensive care unit of a Midwestern Regional Hospital. I was not able to work in the career I was trained in, not insurable because of my mental health diagnosis and was not capable of living by myself and my COBRA benefits were long gone.

A new series of expensive drugs, costing over $1,000.00/month was coming out of my pocketbook. It didn’t take long before my house, extra cars and motorcycle went away while trying to pay my bills. I got a first hand look on what it was like going from a high middle class lifestyle to that of poverty.

I had to maintain my high costs of medications to live, I refused to go on welfare, that’s for lazy people (sarcastic), and I wasn’t going to be a stakeholder on a Medicaid program, that’s for poor people (sarcastic). So what do I do now? How would I recover from this tragic setback? I wrote about this in my book.

I knew of Philanthropic Foundations, sometimes named as Charity Foundations. It was suggested to me to ask for their help. I was use to making “The Ask” yet I felt uncomfortable making applications until I recalled, In all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.

Asking is the cornerstone in building Foundations.

I also wrote the Mott mottos, “Let us be known by our deeds” and “We shall be judged by our deeds”. My definition of deeds is taking action that is performed intentionally. Sometimes the results of action are good while, at other times good intentions go bad.
I needed to ask. The deed was an action to define the mission of the foundation. My deed of action was to fill out the applications for scholarships and grants. I believed in receiving. I did not judge the foundations in respect to who created it, donated and past actions. That did not matter. What mattered was I had an immediate need and the foundations had an immediate response.

Large pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck have foundations that disburse grants in the form of scholarships. There are many foundations in the private sector to be found for a variety of services needed from companies that make Applesauce to Vehicles. Funding does not have to come from taxpayers in the way of state and federal government funds. I believe this fact must be stated. Recovery is not an entitlement program. Recovery takes people in collaboration with the public and private sectors. In my case, it took all three entities to help in my recovery.

I received a scholarship from GlaxoSmithKline that paid for all of my name brand medications, with two annuals grants that took care of my need for prescription drugs. I was granted access, by reduced rates, to my Community Mental Health Center’s services of therapy, medication plan and treatment plan. I was welcomed to my local affiliate of NAMI to become part of a support group. I would have never believed in recovery without what I received, by asking.

Today, I live on my benefits from working that included paying out the maximum limit, in most years, to the federal insurance contributions act and the interest earned from my 401(k) plan that I converted to an IRA.

I try to ‘give back’, only wishing I could make an impact like a large Foundation did. I would like to introduce to you the Mott Foundation, founded in Michigan. Today the Mott Foundation has branch offices in England and South Africa. Charles Stewart Mott and I share the Mott family name. You won’t find information about the Foundation in my book, even though the name of my book is Mott’s Mind. There are many Mott Community Foundations.

Mott built a hospital for children. They started a program to be a community health center. Today they are also a Community Mental Health Center. The hospital has a child and adolescent Psychiatry Department, providing mental health treatment and prevention services. Their goal is to promote the emotional growth of children within the context of their families and community. They provide services for Children who are experiencing emotional, behavioral or mental health concerns and who are at or below 200% of the federal poverty guidelines can be served at the Health Center. Health Plus Partners/PPOM/Champus and other insurers reimburse for our services. Clients are not turned away for inability to pay.

It takes a large and competent staff to run such a facility. There are private hospitals that have shut their doors to mental health wings. Hospital beds are being lost. Is it due to a money problem? In many cases, No.

It is due to a shortage of staff, people working in mental health care with people living with a mental illness. This is a problem throughout the United States. The question is how do you build and sustain a work force?

Mott built a Community College that would help to create a workforce. It goes along with the statement, “If you build it, they will come.”

Mott Community College creates people with an Accredited Associates Degree who work in different areas of Behavior Health. People are not born as mental illness workers. You create them.

Jeanne and Jim Mott of Iowa created a Foundation that is known as the J & J Corporation. It is one of many cornerstones for community based services.

They created and developed a service named M.O.T.T.S., an acronym for what they do in mental health. Their mission states M.O.T.T.S – Our mission is in our name.
• M Mentoring – to reach or counsel in a trusting manner
• O. Outreach – a system of delivery of services to surpass all others
• T. Training – a process of bringing a person to a higher level of proficiency
• T. Transition to aid people in the passage from 1 position or state to another
• S. Support – to give aid or encouragement to those in need

I could continue with more Mott Foundations that have an integral part of the mental illness recovery process.

When you need help, ASK. If the person doesn’t have any information for you, ASK for who they know who can help you.

The cornerstone has been laid for building Foundations that can help you.

Your deed is to ask. If you received nothing, continue asking. Make your asks as a never ending prayer. Expect to receive. Expect to start on a recovery plan.

Expect to have a Mott’s Mind.

Thank you.

Thursday, February 20, 2014

66 out of 100 people are lost Presentation 2 of 5

News Flash-today. By Randy Conyers

“66 out of 100 people are lost. 34 people were found. 9 are in recovery. 25 alive, but status is unknown.” Sounds like trouble on the high seas again, doesn’t it?

Hello, my name is Randy Conyers. I have written the book Mott’s Mind.

The numbers I gave you sounds like a ship sunk and you are hearing the first press release of casualties. The ironic thing is no one died. Its true, lost are 66 with 34 found. The people in recovery are only a single digit. It’s difficult to give an accurate account of “status” unknown. How badly are they hurt? How many are there with burns? Any idea of how many people there are with broken bones? Remember, I’m only questioning the 34 found.

I ponder on the lost, 66 people can not be found. Where are they? Where did they go? All I know, for certain, is none of the 100 died.

These numbers are the statistics found by NAMI, National Alliance on Mental Illness. Only one-third of the people with a diagnosable mental illness in their lifetime is receiving or seeking treatment. That’s the “34 found” of the press release.

I want to focus on the lost 66, the 2/3rds of the mental illness community. Advocates, like Peter Early, have made us aware that our nation’s correctional facilities are deemed as the highest mental health centers, those who committed a crime, regardless of them living with a mental illness.

I am going to share my story of talking with the 66% that I have written about in my book. It is a population that doesn’t understand the word recovery. It is a demographic of uneducated, unaware and misinformed people, and their families, in the area of mental illness.

There are reasons, very justifiable and reasonable, with those who know the system but are not seeking help. First, nothing is confidential. There are exceptions that others are made aware of and action is taken. Mention the word suicide and you have just triggered a series of events. Tell your Therapist you felt like going over to the railroad tracks, a thought that lasted a micro-second, venting your frustration and immediately you are classified as a danger to yourself.

Things can get worse, too. Say anything that can be perceived to be abusive and a red flag goes up, your session stops and is now focused on the abuse. You can’t vent, you can not use figures of speech such as, “I was so mad, I could have killed him right then and there!”

The consequences are life changing. Your children can be taken away or you may be the one taken away from your family. Your job could be put in jeopardy. Your standing in the community can change. You may have your driver’s license revoked.

There are great risks in asking for help with your mental illness.
We need a new innovative way to say, “We in the Behavioral Health field want to work with you on your Recovery. We can’t fix you, but we can give you the opportunity for a better lifestyle, a better quality of life. Have an impact on your life!. Start your Behavioral Health Recovery process today. Join us at my recovery center, 101 Recovery Pathway, Oklahoma City 73001 or give us a call at 800-732-6897. That is 800 RECOVER. Or visit our website at www.MyRecovery.com.

Would these words make recovery seem different in how people think?

Lastly, I want to share one story of the 66 missing that you will find in my book. I’m going to talk to you about Jane Doe. I met Jane during my recovery process.

Jane is a beautiful woman. She’s very striking and always wanted to talk. The day finally came when she could share her story. We spent many hours talking.

She and her son lived with a boyfriend and had all of the relationship problems common to many. It was now summer, warm enough to wear shorts. She had very large scars. She was a cutter. They were very bad, enough to use the correct term of self-mutilation.

It was obvious she should have had multiple stitches on multiple cuts,
a foot in length and longer. It could have taken hundreds of stitches. I had
never seen so many scars. I asked why she didn’t go to the ER. Her
first response was, “my boyfriend wouldn’t let me”. I was stunned,
ready to call the police and report the abuse.

Her story went on. The real story was if she would go for medical care, her son would be taken away from her. The boyfriend was doing his best to treat her at home. It was obvious he did not have any medical training. He was doing the best he could, yet she was looking for an out to get away from her boyfriend.

She chose to state he was a drug user and would steal her medications to get high. She said she took her medication, when she had it.

She had many variations of a story regarding a fire at her home. She
was compelled to cut again. Her stories didn’t add up. She recently
moved to our town. I was at a point where I could get on the Internet
and do research. I found it! Living in a major city in a different state
there was a news article of a tragic house fire around the time she
moved to Kansas. The report contained many mistakes made by the
mother, she was singled out by name. It was horrible, resulting in the death of her youngest child, a baby. All the stories she told to me, plus the news article gave reason for her actions. In my opinion, it was up to her to tell “the rest of the story”. She didn’t. From time to time I would try to influence her to talk about it. I told her I knew what happen in ‘state’. No response. I would tell her I was here to listen, when she was ready to talk about it. No response. At other times I would be more specific. I tried with attempts using the name of the city, the street address and the date of the fire. No response. She had the situation buried so deep within her.

On the surface, she was in complete denial. She continued to cut which, in my opinion, her body and her spirit wanted her to forgive herself. She chose to punish herself rather than forgive.

This was a time I struggled with my religious teachings of free will. I was not a reporter, I was a peer. Any reporting would be denied. She never hurt her son or anyone else for that matter. The boyfriend was doing a great job of protecting her son.

Was she a danger to herself or others? I encouraged her to take her
medication every day, no excuses, and accept help.

Any actions would more than likely result in having her son taken away. Her choice was heart-breaking. My prayer is for her to open up and forgive herself. She continued to move from city to city and boyfriend to boyfriend. I heard from her months later. She stated, “I thought you were my friend.” and hung up.

I could only conclude that someone reported her.

There’s no doubt this woman needs to be in recovery, she needs to accept that fact and work on her recovery.

The question is how can you get her to that point? She is one of the original 66 that is lost and doesn’t want to be found.

Some day, perhaps, we can change our society’s belief system so that everything is like my book, a story of recovery.

Thank you.